• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

ABOUT US RESOURCES TESTIMONIALS BLOG CONTACT US

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Find Your State
  • Find Your Specialty
  • Choose a Facility
  • Resources
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Request A Quote

Should Active Duty Military be Allowed to Sue the Military for Malpractice?

January 18, 2019

Walter Daniel had already experienced his worst nightmare. His wife, Lt. Rebekah Daniel, who served as a nurse in the military, had just died of severe post-partum hemorrhage just two hours after giving birth to their first child. She died in the same naval hospital where she worked as an active-duty nurse. But worse, because of a little-known piece of legislation, Walter Daniel was prevented from finding out what exactly went wrong in the death of his own wife.

The naval Lieutenant’s widower had run up against the Feres Doctrine. According to the doctrine, the United States cannot be considered liable “for injuries to members of the armed forces sustained while on active duty and not on furlough and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces.” In other words, if an active member of the armed forces suffers because of the negligence or malpractice of military physicians, the injured party cannot file suit. More than that, as an internal matter, all records of the incident in question remain private, even from family.

The Feres Doctrine was established in 1950 as a result of Feres v. United States, which combined the wrongful death cases of three separate active duty members of the military. In 1946 the Federal Tort Claims Act was established, which allowed private parties to sue the government of the United States. The plaintiffs in Feres v. United States attempted to file suit against the government according to precedent set by the Act.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against the plaintiffs, arguing that a) the military already had its own system in place to compensate those on active duty, and b) “opening the military to lawsuits might invite second-guessing of command decisions in civilian courts.”

At least from the command side, the reasoning behind the ruling makes sense. If the military has already established a system of compensation, then their service members can be duly compensated without risking the over-cautionary decision-making that plagues civilian doctors that are worried about malpractice suits.

However, the Feres Doctrine also creates a major conflict of interest. If the military is itself deciding a case against its own institution, what’s to prevent cases of gross negligence from being locked behind a “Classified” designation? Also, in the Daniel’s case, an internal investigation means that those on the “outside,” like Lt. Rebekah Daniel’s widower, and her daughter, could be left in the dark forever regarding the circumstances of the death their loved one.

When the Supreme Court hears Lt. Daniel’s case, which it will in the near future, the courts will have to decide how to weigh the rights of military service members against the interests of its military. That should say a lot about how the Feres Doctrine might be applied to today’s issues.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: liability, medical malpractice, medical malpractice lawsuit, military, supreme court, tort

Primary Sidebar

Calendar

January 2019
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Nov   Feb »

Categories

  • Ask eQuoteMD
  • General
  • Malpractice Insurance
  • Malpractice Insurance Coverage
  • Medical Liability Insurance
  • Medical Malpractice
  • medical malpractice insurance
  • medical malpractice lawsuit
  • OB/GYN
  • tail coverage
  • Telehealth
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Affordable Medical Malpractice Insurance best malpractice insurance California claims made coverage damage caps defensive medicine doctors liability insurance group medical malpractice insurance hipaa individual medical malpractice insurance judicial legal legislation liability malpractice malpractice insurance Malpractice Insurance Coverage malpractice insurance for doctors Malpractice Insurance near me malpractice insurance quote medical liability insurance medical malpractice medical malpractice coverage medical malpractice insurance medical malpractice insurance broker medical malpractice insurance companies medical malpractice insurance company Medical Malpractice Insurance for Family Medicine Medical Malpractice Insurance provider medical malpractice insurance providers medical malpractice lawsuit medical professional liability insurance news non-economic damages occurrence physician malpractice insurance policy professional medical liability insurance research study tail tail coverage technology tort reform

Footer

eQuoteMD

BLOG

Integris Group logo

The legal elements involved in a medical malpractice case include: Legal duty Breach of that READ MORE

Doctor And Nurse Suture Patient In Emergency Room

As a physician, you are no doubt aware of the importance of having malpractice insurance to protect READ MORE

Pregnant woman lying down on a hospital bed and talking to a doctor

“Medical Malpractice Insurance policies have become a commodity in the insurance industry, meaning READ MORE

FIND YOUR STATE FIND YOUR SPECIALTY CHOOSE A FACILITY

ABOUT US RESOURCES TESTIMONIALS BLOG CONTACT US

HOME ADA DISCLAIMER PRIVACY POLICY SITEMAP

Copyright © 2023 · eQuoteMD · All Rights Reserved

iHealthspot Medical Website Design and Medical Marketing by iHealthSpot.com

eQuoteMD provides medical malpractice insurance services in all states for all specialties.