• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

ABOUT US RESOURCES TESTIMONIALS BLOG CONTACT US

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Find Your State
  • Find Your Specialty
  • Choose a Facility
  • Resources
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Request A Quote

Voters Reject Proposition 46: No to Random Drug Testing and Raising the Damages Cap

November 11, 2014

California voters rejected Proposition 46 on Tuesday by a more than 2 to 1 margin. The ballot initiative, would have raised caps on noneconomic damages in malpractice cases from $250,000 to over $1M, required doctors to submit to random, state mandated drug and alcohol tests, and required doctors to utilize a state run database when prescribing certain types of drugs. The final vote, which came in at 67.1% against and 32.9% for represents a sound rejection of the measure, and while most expected it to fail the margin is striking.

Proposition 46 garnered national attention and a great deal of money because it was viewed as something of a bellwether. California was the first state to implement a cap on non-economic damages in 1975, and has not raised that cap since. Had proposition 46 passed the cap would have more than quadrupled overnight, which would have set a precedent for other states, more than thirty of which have placed some type of cap on noneconomic damages since California led the way.

Likewise the provisions for state mandated random drug and alcohol testing and a state run prescription drug database raised interest, and in many cases concern, nationwide as questions of privacy and government overreach were debated. Many feared that, as with damage caps, what California did could signal the direction that other states would follow.

As a result of these concerns a great deal of money was sunk into the campaign, especially on the opposing side. In total more than $60M was spent on this one ballot initiative. For perspective, consider that the most expensive Senate race ever run (Thom Thillis vs. Kay Hagan in North Carolina) concluded this year at right around $100M, and many Senate races came in well under that $60M mark. When a state ballot initiative generates as much spending as a Senate race there can be no doubt that it’s seen as having major, national implications.

Some have pointed to the amount of money spent in opposition (substantially more than in favor) and its primary sources (insurance companies) as evidence of greedy corporate interests spinning the narrative to suit their purposes. But the insurance companies stood the most to lose if the proposition had passed, as their risk liability would have increased dramatically, and they were operating in the interests of their clients, the doctors, who would have felt that increased risk in the form of higher premiums. More than that, at some level the general public would have absorbed at least some of that increased cost as rate hikes trickled down to increased general healthcare costs.

On the other hand, it’s not as though the proponents of Prop 46 didn’t represent the interests of wealthy special interests as well. It’s widely acknowledged that the proposition was written by trial lawyers, who of course stood the most to gain if non-economic damage caps were raised. Lawyer fees are usually a percentage of whatever damages are awarded, so the more the damages the higher the paycheck.

Ultimately the people of California seem to have agreed that Proposition 46 was more about benefiting the few at the cost of the many than promoting the general welfare or patient safety. With this landslide vote we expect damage caps to remain in place for the long term in California. It would not be surprising to see them revised upward at some point, but this initiative has proven that such a question has to be considered on its own merits, not as part of a bundle of issues, and that if it’s going to happen Californians agree that it should be done in a modest or incremental fashion that doesn’t shock the healthcare economy and generate fears of huge cost increases.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: California, damage caps, judicial, legal, legislation, non-economic damages, pain and suffering, proposition, tort reform, vote

Primary Sidebar

Calendar

November 2014
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Oct   Dec »

Categories

  • Ask eQuoteMD
  • General
  • Malpractice Insurance
  • Malpractice Insurance Coverage
  • Medical Liability Insurance
  • Medical Malpractice
  • medical malpractice insurance
  • medical malpractice lawsuit
  • OB/GYN
  • tail coverage
  • Telehealth
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Affordable Medical Malpractice Insurance best malpractice insurance California claims made coverage damage caps defensive medicine doctors liability insurance group medical malpractice insurance hipaa individual medical malpractice insurance judicial legal legislation liability malpractice malpractice insurance Malpractice Insurance Coverage malpractice insurance for doctors Malpractice Insurance near me malpractice insurance quote medical liability insurance medical malpractice medical malpractice coverage medical malpractice insurance medical malpractice insurance broker medical malpractice insurance companies medical malpractice insurance company Medical Malpractice Insurance for Family Medicine Medical Malpractice Insurance provider medical malpractice insurance providers medical malpractice lawsuit medical professional liability insurance news non-economic damages occurrence physician malpractice insurance policy professional medical liability insurance research study tail tail coverage technology tort reform

Footer

eQuoteMD

BLOG

Doctor And Nurse Suture Patient In Emergency Room

As a physician, you are no doubt aware of the importance of having malpractice insurance to protect READ MORE

Pregnant woman lying down on a hospital bed and talking to a doctor

“Medical Malpractice Insurance policies have become a commodity in the insurance industry, meaning READ MORE

Dental Malpractice form, and gavel on a surface.

Dental malpractice insurance is an essential element of any dentist's practice. It covers them in READ MORE

FIND YOUR STATE FIND YOUR SPECIALTY CHOOSE A FACILITY

ABOUT US RESOURCES TESTIMONIALS BLOG CONTACT US

HOME ADA DISCLAIMER PRIVACY POLICY SITEMAP

Copyright © 2023 · eQuoteMD · All Rights Reserved

iHealthspot Medical Website Design and Medical Marketing by iHealthSpot.com

eQuoteMD provides medical malpractice insurance services in all states for all specialties.